MSN FP6610 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Essay help

Assignment: Comprehensive Needs Assessment

Begin on an interactive simulation journey to delve into the pivotal role nurses play in health care coordination. Following this immersive experience, craft a comprehensive patient needs assessment spanning 4–5 pages.

Please bear in mind that each assessment within this course is intricately linked, forming a cohesive progression. It is paramount to navigate through these assessments in the designated order. MSN FP6610 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Essay.

In the dynamic landscape of health care, care coordination emerges as a complex field. The surge in providers, diverse care settings, and varied care delivery methods intensifies this complexity. Hospitals are proactively addressing gaps in care coordination through interventions like enhanced communication systems, information technology, and strategic personnel resourcing. This assessment affords you the opportunity to conduct a thorough needs assessment.

MSN FP6610 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Essay

Successfully completing this assessment showcases your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Determine the influence of current health care legislation, policy, and research on evidence-based practice in assessment by care coordinators. ◦ Identify prevailing gaps in a patient’s care. ◦ Develop a strategy for acquiring additional necessary assessment data not readily available from an initial patient interview.

Competency 2: Evaluate current factors (such as population health, cost, interprofessional communications) affecting patient outcomes related to care coordination. ◦ Identify factors most likely to impact patient outcomes. ◦ Advocate for the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care that a care coordination plan would foster. MSN FP6610 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Essay.

Competency 3: Determine appropriate care coordination performance measures for driving high-quality patient outcomes, based on current accrediting standards and benchmarks. ◦ Identify specific patient and care coordination outcome measures related to specific accrediting standards.

Competency 4: Apply relevant evidence-based practices that reflect a shift toward a broader population health focus on patient outcomes. ◦ Identify evidence-based practices from the literature necessary to successfully implement a plan of care.

Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. ◦ Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics. ◦ Support main points, claims, and conclusions with credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. MSN FP6610 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Essay.

Context

In their seminal work, “To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System,” Kohn, Corrigan, and Donaldson (2000) underscored collaborative communication and the reduction of medical errors as top priorities to enhance the quality and safety of patient care. Responding to this imperative, the National Quality Forum (NQF), a nonprofit organization catalyzing improvements in health care, identified care coordination as a vital national strategy to enhance patient safety and quality of care delivery.

Care coordination is a cornerstone supporting patient safety and quality, recognized as a professional standard among registered nurses irrespective of their practice setting. Whether educating a patient about medication and care plans or reviewing follow-up care, nurses play an indispensable role in ensuring continuity of care for all patients.

As the health care landscape evolves, so does the concept of care coordination. This assignment, the Comprehensive Needs Assessment, serves as a crucial step in understanding and addressing the complexities inherent in providing seamless, patient-centered care.

Reference

Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from National Academies Press

What to Consider in Comprehensive Needs Assessment

As you approach this assessment, consider delving into additional perspectives to enhance your understanding. Reflect on these questions to broaden your viewpoint, discuss them with peers or professionals, and use them as a tool for personal development. Remember, these questions are for your exploration and growth and do not require submission as part of your assessment.

  1. What motivates the completion of a patient needs assessment?
  2. Which types of information hold the most value in enhancing patient outcomes?
  3. What advantages stem from adopting a multidisciplinary approach to coordinated care?

Now, let’s move on to the assessment instructions.

Assessment Instructions

Ensure you follow the sequence of assessments as presented in the course.

Preparation

Commence your preparation by engaging in the Vila Health: The Nurse’s Role in Care Coordination simulation, accessible through the Required Resources. Extract patient information from the simulation, as it forms the basis for your needs assessment.

Please note that you have the option to submit part or all of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before finalizing the assessment. If you choose this service, consider the 24–48 hour turnaround time for feedback.

Requirements

Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment for Mr. Decker, utilizing the information gleaned from the Vila Health simulation.

Format and Length

Structure your needs assessment according to APA style guidelines. Employ the APA Style Paper Template (linked in the Required Resources) and refer to the APA Style Paper Tutorial (accessible in the Suggested Resources) for assistance. Include the following components:

  • Title page and reference page.
  • A running head on all pages.
  • Appropriate section headings.

Your needs assessment should span 4–5 pages, excluding the title page and references page.

Supporting Evidence

Underpin your assessment with 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence, reinforcing the validity and credibility of your findings.

By following these guidelines, you’ll create a robust needs assessment that aligns with academic standards and contributes to the holistic understanding of Mr. Decker’s healthcare needs.

Conducting the Assessment: Assignment – Comprehensive Needs Assessment

To ensure your needs assessment aligns with the evaluation criteria outlined in the scoring guide, address each requirement thoroughly. Familiarize yourself with the Needs Assessment Scoring Guide to grasp how each criterion contributes to the assessment’s evaluation.

  1. Identify Current Gaps in the Patient’s Care:
    • Utilize an appropriate needs assessment tool for gap identification.
    • Deliberate on the types of patient information crucial for assessing the current level of care.
  2. Develop a Strategy for Gathering Additional Assessment Data:
    • Contemplate the comprehensive range of interconnected needs influencing the patient’s health.
  3. Identify Factors Affecting Patient Outcomes:
    • Evaluate potential effects of identified factors on outcomes.
    • Substantiate your conclusions with credible evidence.
  4. Identify Patient and Care Coordination Outcome Measures:
    • Recognize applicable accrediting standards.
    • Rationalize measuring outcomes based on accrediting agencies.
    • Clarify the relationship between specific outcomes and standards.
  5. Identify Evidence-Based Practices from the Literature:
    • Verify the relevance and credibility of your sources.
    • Embrace best practices with a population-health focus on patient outcomes.
  6. Advocate for Multidisciplinary Approach:
    • Articulate key points in your argument.
    • Substantiate your assertions with compelling evidence.
  7. Write Clearly and Concisely:
    • Present main points and conclusions coherently.
    • Proofread to minimize distractions from errors, enabling focus on the assessment’s substance.
  8. Support Points with Credible Evidence:
    • Employ correct APA style for citations and references.

Comprehensive Needs Assessment: The Influence of Healthcare Policy on Evidence-Based Practice

Health legislation, policy, and research significantly impact clinical practices, necessitating restructuring by healthcare practitioners to meet evidence-based practice standards. Evidence-based practice is a vital focus of national and global health agendas, with the United States implementing policies like the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to regulate healthcare practices. While the PPACA aimed to enhance care quality and accessibility, it has inadvertently led to gaps in the healthcare system, such as a projected shortage of health professionals and decreased patient satisfaction. Gaining insights from healthcare workers affected by such policies, especially nurses and private practitioners, provides valuable perspectives on the implications for evidence-based practices. MSN FP6610 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Essay. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for adapting healthcare strategies to the evolving landscape of policy-induced challenges and opportunities.

Factors Influencing Patient Outcomes in Care Coordination

Care coordination is a purposeful effort to organize patient care activities among multiple healthcare participants, fostering effective healthcare service delivery (Hillis et al., 2016). It goes beyond mere organization, delving into areas that require improvement or enhanced satisfaction. Key factors impacting patient outcomes in care coordination encompass population health and interpersonal communication. Placing the patient population at the core of care coordination involves a comprehensive assessment of their needs before devising strategies and improvement plans within healthcare organizations (Hillis et al., 2016). This approach ensures that healthcare providers align their goals with the community’s health requirements.

In the context of interpersonal communication, care coordination plays a vital role in navigating the complexities of the current healthcare system for patients. A lack of interoperability within the healthcare system can impede patient services, hindering the purpose of evidence-based practice in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. Effective communication and coordination in an interoperable system allow practitioners to monitor each other’s activities within a facility, promoting transparency and accountability in patient care (Hillis et al., 2016).

Implementing a care coordination plan yields multiple benefits for both patients and healthcare providers. It ensures procedural accuracy, efficient execution of healthcare tasks, and overall accountability. These advantages contribute to reducing healthcare costs for patients, stemming from factors like readmissions and medical errors. Properly coordinated care also optimizes the utilization of hospital facilities and resources.

Performance Measures for Care Coordination Based on Accreditation Standards

Performance measures gauge changes in the health status of individuals, groups, organizations, or populations associated with health interventions. These measures align with national standards, international benchmarks, and financial incentives. Specific outcome measures for patient care coordination include:

  1. Mortality Rates: A reduction in mortality rates for a particular illness indicates an improvement in care coordination activities.
  2. Readmissions: Increased rates of readmissions post-hospitalization suggest that the initial care failed to achieve optimal healing levels, falling below expected healthcare facility performance standards.
  3. Safety of Care: Assessing the safety of care in a healthcare facility involves monitoring issues such as Hospital Acquired Infections (HAI). Instances of HAI may signal inadequate care coordination meeting accreditation levels.
  4. Patient’s Experience: The patient’s perception of the quality of care at a facility serves as a valuable performance measure. Patients, having experienced different healthcare facilities, can effectively compare current services with previous experiences, providing insights into the degree of practiced care coordination (Tzelepis et al., 2015).

Implementing Evidence-Based Practices for Plan of Care

Infection Control

Patients expect a healthcare facility to be a place of healing, not a source of additional health concerns. In the realm of evidence-based practice, nurses play a crucial role in preventing hospital-acquired infections during a patient’s treatment. Hospital-acquired infections can serve as indicators of potential outbreaks within the population, prompting the need for evidence-based strategies in healthcare planning (Seddon et al., 2015). Adhering to infection control policies, which involve maintaining a clean hospital environment, utilizing protective attire, and practicing proper hand hygiene, becomes paramount for effective infection control.

Data Gathering and Presentation to Staff and Physicians

Efficient coordination within a healthcare organization involves organizing and presenting data related to blood pressure results, oxygen utilization, and infection trends to physicians and authorized hospital personnel. This evidence-based practice aids in structuring healthcare plans by offering insights into prevalent illnesses and patient demographics within the population (Seddon et al., 2015). The gathered information guides facility planning, enabling the allocation of adequate resources to health faculties receiving a high influx of patients. Moreover, healthcare planning can optimize expenditure by prioritizing illnesses affecting a larger segment of the population. This strategic approach enhances the overall efficiency of resource utilization within the healthcare system.

References

Hillis, R., Brenner, M., Larkin, P. J., Cawley, D., & Connolly, M. (2016). The role of care coordinator for children with complex care needs: A systematic review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16(2), 1–18.

Huntington, W. V., Covington, L. A., Center, P. P., Covington, L. A., & Manchikanti, L. (2011). Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: reforming the health care reform for the new decade. Pain physician, 14(1), E35-E67.

Seddon, D., Krayer, A., Robinson, C., Woods, B., & Tommis, Y. (2013). Care coordination: Translating policy into practice for older people. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 14(2), 81–92.

Tzelepis, F., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Zucca, A. C., & Fradgley, E. A. (2015). Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: Why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment. Patient Preference and Adherence, 9, 831–835. MSN FP6610 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Essay.

Comprehensive Needs Assessment Scoring Guide

CriteriaNon-performanceBasicProficientDistinguished
Identify current gaps in a patient’s care.Does not identify perceived gaps in a patient’s care.Identifies perceived gaps in a patient’s care unsupported by the available data.Identifies current gaps in a patient’s care.Identifies current gaps in a patient’s care, based on a comprehensive, patient-centered needs assessment that includes patient-reported data.
Develop a strategy for gathering additional necessary assessment data not readily available from an initial patient interview.Does not suggest a general approach for gathering needs assessment data from an initial patient interview.Suggests a general approach for gathering needs assessment data from an initial patient interview.Develops a strategy for gathering additional, necessary assessment data not readily available from an initial patient interview.Develops a strategy for gathering additional necessary assessment data not readily available from an initial patient interview. The strategy reflects a holistic, coordinated care perspective.
Identify factors most likely to affect patient outcomes.Does not identify factors having some effect on patient outcomes.Identifies factors having some effect on patient outcomes, including those that are substantially unrelated to patient outcomes.Identifies factors most likely to affect patient outcomes.Identifies factors most likely to affect patient outcomes. Describes clear cause-and-effect relationships supported by credible evidence.
Identify specific patient and care coordination outcome measures related to specific accrediting standards.Does not identify patient and care coordination outcome measures.Identifies patient and care coordination outcome measures.Identifies specific patient and care coordination outcome measures related to specific accrediting standards.Identifies specific patient and care coordination outcome measures related to specific accrediting standards. Provides justification for following accrediting agency guidelines and articulates clear relationships among outcomes and standards.
Identify evidence-based practices from the literature necessary to successfully implement a plan of care.Does not identify evidence-based practices that support a plan of care.Identifies evidence-based practices that support a plan of care.Identifies evidence-based practices from the literature necessary to successfully implement a plan of care.Identifies evidence-based practices from current and credible sources, necessary to successfully implement a plan of care from a population-health perspective.
Advocate for the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care that a care coordination plan would foster.Does not list benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care that a care coordination plan would foster.Lists benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care that a care coordination plan would foster.Advocates for the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care that a care coordination plan would foster.Advocates for the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care that a care coordination plan would foster. Presents an astute, well-reasoned argument supported by credible evidence.
Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.Does not write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.Writing is not consistently clear or concise, or errors in grammar and mechanics inhibit effective communication.Writes clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.Writes clearly and concisely. Grammar and mechanics are error-free.
Support main points, claims, and conclusions with credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.Does not support main points, claims, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.Main points, claims, and conclusions are not well supported. Sources lack relevance or credibility, or are incorrectly formatted.Supports main points, claims, and conclusions with credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.Supports main points, claims, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Source citations and references are error-free.

Related Services

MSN capstone services