Select a specific health care technology-related regulation, law, statute, or ethical standard that applies to informatics. Provide a summary of your example and a statement describing your reasoning either in support of the example you select, or in opposition to it.
Take into consideration the ethics of a Christian worldview in relation to the ethical standard, etc. in your summary.
DNP 805 Topic 1 Discussion 1 Sample Answer
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009 was crafted to empower the Federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to oversee the advancement of health information technology (Health IT). Health IT encompasses the technology tools employed by various healthcare stakeholders, including physicians, patients, insurance companies, nurses, and health administrators, for the storage, analysis, and sharing of health information. The Act granted the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) the authority to issue final rulings for incentive programs related to electronic health record (EHR) management. Financial incentives were designated for healthcare providers embracing technologies enabling the “meaningful use of certified EHR technology” (Salz, 2011).
According to Salz, HITECH has sparked significant growth in healthcare technology, creating new opportunities in the job market. Before HITECH, enforcement of regulations like the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) had become lax. Training, implementation, and enforcement of rules had become negligent. However, with HITECH, compliance is reinforced and is now a requirement for meaningful use. Neglecting the rules can result in penalties under the HITECH Act. Meaningful use involves the use of EHR to submit clinical quality data and exchange health information to enhance the quality of care. It necessitates specific objectives in a structured format, such as e-prescribing, computerized order entry, maintaining an accurate medication list, providing electronic copies of patient records upon request, protecting electronic health information, and exchanging clinical information among care providers (Salz, 2011). Incentives were established for implementing systems, while penalties awaited those failing to meet specific timelines (Salz, 2011).
The HITECH Act is commendable as it incentivizes healthcare professionals to be strategic and collaborative in forming systems to enhance patient safety through effective electronic communication. Drawing on my twenty-three years of experience in healthcare management, I’ve witnessed the transformation from fragmented and difficult patient care to a more streamlined process with electronic records. The legibility and readability issues that plagued traditional medical records, leading to misunderstandings and avoidable errors, have significantly diminished. Electronic records offer information clarity, reducing the chance of misinterpretation and enhancing overall healthcare efficiency.
However, this technological advancement comes at a cost. Having worked with various electronic health record systems, I’ve observed substantial differences in user-friendliness. Some systems facilitate easy information retrieval and navigation, while others prove cumbersome and contribute to potential errors. Privacy, confidentiality, security breaches, and record accuracy are ongoing concerns. Safeguards must be in place to prevent breaches and ensure the accuracy of data entries. The ethical dilemma of inaccurate data spreading quickly in the digital realm underscores the need for a robust and secure electronic health infrastructure. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, addressing these challenges becomes pivotal in harnessing the full potential of health information technology for improved patient outcomes.
Also Read: DNP-805A Healthcare Informatics
Salz, T. (2011). Meaningful use will change how you operate: adherence to the hitech act is mandatory, so don’t wait to familiarize yourself with its incentives and penalties. Medical Economics, (24), 71. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohostcom.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx? direct=true&db=edsgih&AN=edsgcl.276896791&site=eds-live&scope=site